<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Good enough&#8221; technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://e-patients.net/archives/2007/07/good-enough-technology.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2007/07/good-enough-technology.html</link>
	<description>because health professionals can&#039;t do it alone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SusannahFox</title>
		<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2007/07/good-enough-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-50221</link>
		<dc:creator>SusannahFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.9.147.40/archives/2007/07/good-enough-technology.html#comment-50221</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Is it b/c consumers trust Dr. Google as a good-enough tool? http://is.gd/eU6m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Is it b/c consumers trust Dr. Google as a good-enough tool? <a href="http://is.gd/eU6m" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/eU6m</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susannah Fox</title>
		<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2007/07/good-enough-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Susannah Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.9.147.40/archives/2007/07/good-enough-technology.html#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Ward Cunningham kindly emailed me to correct the impression that he wrote the definition on his site when it was, in fact, contributed by an anonymous poster. He wrote, &quot;My friend James Bach coined the term &#039;good enough&#039; in the context of software testing. This was at a point where most software wasn&#039;t being tested at all well and he was trying to set the bar at a practical level, not the &#039;zero defect&#039; level that was claimed as the proper goal. I&#039;m often quoted for asking &#039;what is the simplest thing that could possibly work?&#039; This is a good question to ask when progress slows. My logic is that it is easier to make a working system better than to create a great system from scratch.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ward Cunningham kindly emailed me to correct the impression that he wrote the definition on his site when it was, in fact, contributed by an anonymous poster. He wrote, &#8220;My friend James Bach coined the term &#8216;good enough&#8217; in the context of software testing. This was at a point where most software wasn&#8217;t being tested at all well and he was trying to set the bar at a practical level, not the &#8216;zero defect&#8217; level that was claimed as the proper goal. I&#8217;m often quoted for asking &#8216;what is the simplest thing that could possibly work?&#8217; This is a good question to ask when progress slows. My logic is that it is easier to make a working system better than to create a great system from scratch.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
