<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>For Sale: Revolution HealthComments on: --</title>
	<atom:link href="http://e-patients.net/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html</link>
	<description>because health professionals can&#039;t do it alone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Label Rights</title>
		<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-47766</link>
		<dc:creator>Private Label Rights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.9.147.40/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html#comment-47766</guid>
		<description>Wow - I can&#039;t believe this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; I can&#8217;t believe this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Grohol</title>
		<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>John Grohol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.9.147.40/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html#comment-479</guid>
		<description>Well, I wouldn&#039;t say &quot;greed&quot; was their only or even primary motivation (although it may certainly look that way). I honestly believe Revolution thought they could make a significant dent in the U.S. healthcare system in general by putting together an online health portal, online medical record, etc. The biggest faux pas on their part in not being humble enough to understand he didn&#039;t have a clue as to how to do it. And instead of surrounding themselves with talented healthcare folks who could help them figure it out, they went down the classic dot.com startup path and focused on the technology rather than the expertise.

Look, technology online has its place. But if you&#039;re building a content-specific site (and trying to change an entire industry in the process!), you&#039;d better put the technology on the back burner and really understand the pain points and how your solution is going to address them and fill a need in the marketplace.

The original concept and idea of Revolution was high-minded. The implementation of that idea was very much a waste of $100 or $150 million in investors&#039; money, largely for syndicated content on a slick, but virtually useless, platform. They brought almost nothing new to the game and did little to understand the market they were trying to reach (until it was far too late).



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I wouldn&#8217;t say &#8220;greed&#8221; was their only or even primary motivation (although it may certainly look that way). I honestly believe Revolution thought they could make a significant dent in the U.S. healthcare system in general by putting together an online health portal, online medical record, etc. The biggest faux pas on their part in not being humble enough to understand he didn&#8217;t have a clue as to how to do it. And instead of surrounding themselves with talented healthcare folks who could help them figure it out, they went down the classic dot.com startup path and focused on the technology rather than the expertise.</p>
<p>Look, technology online has its place. But if you&#8217;re building a content-specific site (and trying to change an entire industry in the process!), you&#8217;d better put the technology on the back burner and really understand the pain points and how your solution is going to address them and fill a need in the marketplace.</p>
<p>The original concept and idea of Revolution was high-minded. The implementation of that idea was very much a waste of $100 or $150 million in investors&#8217; money, largely for syndicated content on a slick, but virtually useless, platform. They brought almost nothing new to the game and did little to understand the market they were trying to reach (until it was far too late).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles Frydman</title>
		<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles Frydman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.9.147.40/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Revolution Health unlike DiabetesMine or ACOR never provided what patients and caregivers want.
Both of our sites provide enlightened self-interest: we help others and in turn, it helps us. Revolution Health, OTOH, was much more driven by greed. You cannot build high quality health resources if greed is your primary motivation.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revolution Health unlike DiabetesMine or ACOR never provided what patients and caregivers want.<br />
Both of our sites provide enlightened self-interest: we help others and in turn, it helps us. Revolution Health, OTOH, was much more driven by greed. You cannot build high quality health resources if greed is your primary motivation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan @ Patient Vanguard</title>
		<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan @ Patient Vanguard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.9.147.40/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Steve Case&#039;s initial impetus for considering a Web offering like &quot;Revolution Health&quot; was to create a &quot;place&quot; for folks to &quot;visit&quot; and access the health care information, direction, and patient tools they needed to support a successful health care experience . . . one time or multiple times.

Initially Case was driven by his family&#039;s experiences during the illness and eventual death of his brother from cancer - his brother and his family experienced the same difficult journey throughout the patient experience as do many, feeling helpless, unprepared, and sometimes irrelevant during the process.

Why not create a Web site, and corresponding e-business to support the needs of patients and their families?

Well, sadly Revolution Health became just another information-only Health and Wellness Web site with extensive advertising, and a user experience out of the late 1990&#039;s - lots of information, but still very &quot;flat.&quot; Very little information for users to personalize, to make contextual, or to apply to their unique patient experience in a meaningful way.

As a patient, advocate, family member, caregiver, I want my e-world experience to be more than an information-only experience. I&#039;ll return to a site that continues to educate, while offering information and tools in a way that teaches me how to personalize the information to meet my unique heath care needs, show me how to engage with my providers, to dialog, to advocate for myself, and manage my health successfully.

Sorry to hear about Revolution Health though - we need more successful efforts in the business of e-patient/consumer education.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Case&#8217;s initial impetus for considering a Web offering like &#8220;Revolution Health&#8221; was to create a &#8220;place&#8221; for folks to &#8220;visit&#8221; and access the health care information, direction, and patient tools they needed to support a successful health care experience . . . one time or multiple times.</p>
<p>Initially Case was driven by his family&#8217;s experiences during the illness and eventual death of his brother from cancer &#8211; his brother and his family experienced the same difficult journey throughout the patient experience as do many, feeling helpless, unprepared, and sometimes irrelevant during the process.</p>
<p>Why not create a Web site, and corresponding e-business to support the needs of patients and their families?</p>
<p>Well, sadly Revolution Health became just another information-only Health and Wellness Web site with extensive advertising, and a user experience out of the late 1990&#8242;s &#8211; lots of information, but still very &#8220;flat.&#8221; Very little information for users to personalize, to make contextual, or to apply to their unique patient experience in a meaningful way.</p>
<p>As a patient, advocate, family member, caregiver, I want my e-world experience to be more than an information-only experience. I&#8217;ll return to a site that continues to educate, while offering information and tools in a way that teaches me how to personalize the information to meet my unique heath care needs, show me how to engage with my providers, to dialog, to advocate for myself, and manage my health successfully.</p>
<p>Sorry to hear about Revolution Health though &#8211; we need more successful efforts in the business of e-patient/consumer education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-Patient Dave</title>
		<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>e-Patient Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.9.147.40/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html#comment-476</guid>
		<description>So, Amy, what makes something compelling?

Really important question.  We&#039;re right here on the frontier, in a sense. What makes the difference in a site that makes it and one that doesn&#039;t?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Amy, what makes something compelling?</p>
<p>Really important question.  We&#8217;re right here on the frontier, in a sense. What makes the difference in a site that makes it and one that doesn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmyT of www.diabetesmine.com</title>
		<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>AmyT of www.diabetesmine.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.9.147.40/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Ouch. Not pretty.

The problem with Revolution Health, the way I see it, is that they didn&#039;t manage to create an atmosphere that was compelling for patients / visitors to keep coming back.  Even less so after reading this.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch. Not pretty.</p>
<p>The problem with Revolution Health, the way I see it, is that they didn&#8217;t manage to create an atmosphere that was compelling for patients / visitors to keep coming back.  Even less so after reading this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-Patient Dave</title>
		<link>http://e-patients.net/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>e-Patient Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.9.147.40/archives/2008/09/for-sale-revolution-health.html#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing this, John.  Amid the vast and hairy cosmos of healthcare transformation issues, wised-up patients (or their advocates) need to know the economic realities of what drives the companies and those who create them.

Also, speaking as another person who&#039;s committed to creating the new world, I hear your frustration at having tried for (at least) a decade to bring it into existence, apparently seeing it all perverted into personal gain schemes.  I don&#039;t mind personal gain, but I want it to be aligned with creation of great works.

Just my opinion as one noisy blogger.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing this, John.  Amid the vast and hairy cosmos of healthcare transformation issues, wised-up patients (or their advocates) need to know the economic realities of what drives the companies and those who create them.</p>
<p>Also, speaking as another person who&#8217;s committed to creating the new world, I hear your frustration at having tried for (at least) a decade to bring it into existence, apparently seeing it all perverted into personal gain schemes.  I don&#8217;t mind personal gain, but I want it to be aligned with creation of great works.</p>
<p>Just my opinion as one noisy blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

